SecurityTracker.com
Keep Track of the Latest Vulnerabilities
with SecurityTracker!
    Home    |    View Topics    |    Search    |    Contact Us    |    Help    |   

SecurityTracker
Archives


Welcome to SecurityTracker!
 
Click to Sign Up
Sign Up
Sign Up for Your FREE Weekly SecurityTracker E-mail Alert Summary
Instant Alerts
Buy our Premium Vulnerability Notification Service to receive customized, instant alerts
Affiliates
Put SecurityTracker Vulnerability Alerts on Your Web Site -- It's Free!
Partners
Become a Partner and License Our Database or Notification Service
Report a Bug
Report a vulnerability that you have found to SecurityTracker
bugs
@
securitytracker.com

Sign Up!





Category:  Networking Stack (TCP/IP)  >  TCP/IP Stack Implementation Vendors:  Microsoft
(Microsoft Issues Fix) Multiple Vendor TCP Stack Implementations Let Remote Users Deny Service
SecurityTracker Alert ID:  1017036
SecurityTracker URL:  http://securitytracker.com/id?1017036
CVE Reference:  CVE-2004-0230   (Links to External Site)
OSVDB Reference:  4030   (Links to External Site)
Date:  Oct 10 2006
Impact:  Denial of service via network
Fix Available:  Yes   Vendor Confirmed:  Yes  
Advisory:  Microsoft Security Bulletin
Description:  A vulnerability was reported in several TCP stack implementations. A remote user may be able to cause denial of service conditions using a TCP reset attack. Multiple vendors are affected.

The UK National Infrastructure Security Co-Ordination Centre (NISCC) reported that some implementations of the Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) are particularly vulnerable to TCP reset attacks. A remote user can cause TCP sessions to terminate prematurely, causing denial of service conditions.

The specific impact on applications that use TCP depends on the mechanisms built into the application to address premature TCP session termination.

According to the report, NISCC considers the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP) to be one of the most affected applications, as it relies on a persistent TCP session between BGP peer entities. Premature termination of an underlying TCP session may require routing tables to be rebuilt and may cause "route flapping". In the case of BGP, using the TCP MD5 Signature Option and anti-spoofing measures can mitigate the vulnerability.

Other applications, such as Domain Name System (DNS) and (Secure Sockets Layer) SSL based applications may also be affected, but to a lesser degree, the report said.

A remote user can reportedly send a TCP packet with the RST (reset) flag set (or the SYN flag) with the appropriate spoofed source and destination IP addresses and TCP ports to cause the TCP session to be terminated. Ordinarily, the remote user may have the probability of 1 in 2^32 of guessing the correct sequence number, the report said. However, in actuality, a remote user may be able to guess an appropriate sequence number with much greater probability because many implementations will accept any sequence number within a certain window of the expected sequence number. The Associate Press reports that the proper number can be guessed within as few as four attempts, requiring only seconds to achieve.

The report credits Paul A. Watson for discovering a practical method for conducting TCP reset attacks (presented in "Slipping In The Window: TCP Reset Attacks" at the CanSecWest 2004 conference).

The report indicates that the following vendors are affected [this is not an inclusive list]:

- Cray Inc. is vulnerable on their UNICOS, UNICOS/mk and UNICOS/mp systems

- Check Point is affected, but has issued a protection mechanism in the latest release for VPN-1/FireWall-1 (R55 HFA-03) that can protect both the firewall device and hosts located behind the firewall.

- Internet Initiative Japan, Inc (IIJ) is affected.

- InterNiche NicheStack and NicheLite are affected.

- Juniper Networks products are affected.

- Cisco products are affected, including IOS and non-IOS based devices.

Other vendors are assessing the impact of this flaw.

The NISCC Vulnerability Advisory 236929 is available at:

http://www.uniras.gov.uk/vuls/2004/236929/index.htm

Impact:  A remote user can cause denial of service on the target TCP session. The specific impact depends on the specific vendor implementation.
Solution:  The vendor has issued the following fixes:

Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 1 and Microsoft Windows XP Service Pack 2:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.as px?FamilyId=9fd73d12-ff7c-411d-944d-a6f147b20775

Microsoft Windows XP Professional x64 Edition:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=fc98f55c-52 0e-4a68-a3c3-0df51c6122bb

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 1:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=1 02591a0-2b58-497b-bc20-593571b96e9c

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 for Itanium-based Systems and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 with SP1 for Itanium-based Systems:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=12515d47-134d-4d1f-9ae7-f0a7167ec424

Microsoft Windows Server 2003 x64 Edition:

http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=c5faba34-48f5-4875-a0fa-6b8207f9b276

A restart is required.

The Microsoft advisory is available at:

http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms06-064.mspx

Vendor URL:  www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms06-064.mspx (Links to External Site)
Cause:  State error
Underlying OS:  Windows (2003), Windows (XP)
Underlying OS Comments:  2003 SP1, XP SP2; and prior service packs

Message History:   This archive entry is a follow-up to the message listed below.
Apr 20 2004 Multiple Vendor TCP Stack Implementations Let Remote Users Deny Service



 Source Message Contents

Date:  Tue, 10 Oct 2006 15:18:04 -0400
Subject:  Microsoft Security Bulletin MS06-064: Vulnerabilities in TCP/IP IPv6 Could Allow Denial of Service (922819)

 
 
 
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/security/bulletin/ms06-064.mspx
 
CVE-2004-0790
CVE-2004-0230
CVE-2005-0688
 


Go to the Top of This SecurityTracker Archive Page





Home   |    View Topics   |    Search   |    Contact Us   |    Help

Copyright 2006, SecurityGlobal.net LLC